<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 380 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that only the amortized cost of machinery supplied free of cost by customers should be included in calculating the value of goods manufactured. The decision was based on a previous Larger Bench ruling. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, remanding the matter for a fresh decision by the original authority with instructions to provide adequate opportunity to the respondents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing details to the department and invoked a longer limitation period due to lack of disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 380 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that only the amortized cost of machinery supplied free of cost by customers should be included in calculating the value of goods manufactured. The decision was based on a previous Larger Bench ruling. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, remanding the matter for a fresh decision by the original authority with instructions to provide adequate opportunity to the respondents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing details to the department and invoked a longer limitation period due to lack of disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>