<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 430 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of diamonds and duty demand on gold shortage, along with penalties imposed on the appellant company for artificial transactions aimed at boosting export turnover without real value addition. The Managing Director&#039;s penalty was set aside. The company&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on confiscation and duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 430 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of diamonds and duty demand on gold shortage, along with penalties imposed on the appellant company for artificial transactions aimed at boosting export turnover without real value addition. The Managing Director&#039;s penalty was set aside. The company&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on confiscation and duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>