<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 428 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77537</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s authority to attach factory premises leased to a company for recovery of dues under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the successor could be held liable for the lessee&#039;s dues as the lessee was still in possession of the property. The amended provisions of Section 11 were deemed irrelevant, and a stay was granted against property disposal during the appeal. An early hearing was scheduled due to the significant amount involved, emphasizing the need for a prompt resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 428 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77537</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the department&#039;s authority to attach factory premises leased to a company for recovery of dues under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that the successor could be held liable for the lessee&#039;s dues as the lessee was still in possession of the property. The amended provisions of Section 11 were deemed irrelevant, and a stay was granted against property disposal during the appeal. An early hearing was scheduled due to the significant amount involved, emphasizing the need for a prompt resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>