<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 421 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77522</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the dismissal of writ petitions challenging a show cause notice alleging fraud in DEPB licenses. The appellants were directed to provide explanations within four weeks, with the liberty to raise the plea of limitation. Relying on previous decisions, the Court emphasized that disputed factual issues cannot be resolved through affidavits alone. The Division Bench rejected arguments that the show cause notice was not maintainable in writ proceedings. The writ appeals were dismissed, affirming the learned Judge&#039;s decision, and appellants were instructed to comply with the directives within the specified timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 421 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77522</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the dismissal of writ petitions challenging a show cause notice alleging fraud in DEPB licenses. The appellants were directed to provide explanations within four weeks, with the liberty to raise the plea of limitation. Relying on previous decisions, the Court emphasized that disputed factual issues cannot be resolved through affidavits alone. The Division Bench rejected arguments that the show cause notice was not maintainable in writ proceedings. The writ appeals were dismissed, affirming the learned Judge&#039;s decision, and appellants were instructed to comply with the directives within the specified timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>