<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 411 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77486</link>
    <description>The Court held that the deposit order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is appealable under Section 35G as it is considered an order made in appeal. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy available and the writ petition was dismissed, with a directive to withhold dismissing the petitioner&#039;s appeal before the Appellate Tribunal for two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 411 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77486</link>
      <description>The Court held that the deposit order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, is appealable under Section 35G as it is considered an order made in appeal. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory remedy available and the writ petition was dismissed, with a directive to withhold dismissing the petitioner&#039;s appeal before the Appellate Tribunal for two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>