<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77484</link>
    <description>The Court emphasized the importance of seeking clearance from the Committee before initiating litigation to monitor disputes between government entities and public sector undertakings. Acknowledging challenges faced by the Committee on Disputes (COD), the Court recognized the need for a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism to prevent delays and additional litigation. It agreed to reassess the necessity of obtaining clearance from the COD and highlighted the potential reconsideration of previous judgments by three-judge benches of the Supreme Court, directing matters to the Chief Justice of India for guidance on potential reevaluation of legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 361 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77484</link>
      <description>The Court emphasized the importance of seeking clearance from the Committee before initiating litigation to monitor disputes between government entities and public sector undertakings. Acknowledging challenges faced by the Committee on Disputes (COD), the Court recognized the need for a more efficient dispute resolution mechanism to prevent delays and additional litigation. It agreed to reassess the necessity of obtaining clearance from the COD and highlighted the potential reconsideration of previous judgments by three-judge benches of the Supreme Court, directing matters to the Chief Justice of India for guidance on potential reevaluation of legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>