<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 353 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision that the explanation clause under entry No. 35 of Notification No. 04/2006-C.E. applies exclusively to that entry and not to other entries. It determined that Zinc Sulphate is classifiable under Chapter 28, not Chapter 31 as a fertilizer. The appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were found liable to pay excise duty on Sulphuric Acid procured without duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 353 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision that the explanation clause under entry No. 35 of Notification No. 04/2006-C.E. applies exclusively to that entry and not to other entries. It determined that Zinc Sulphate is classifiable under Chapter 28, not Chapter 31 as a fertilizer. The appeals were dismissed, and the appellants were found liable to pay excise duty on Sulphuric Acid procured without duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>