<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77479</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the reassessment based on a mere change of opinion was not valid under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court rejected the argument that additional grounds for reopening the assessment, including excess gratuity provision and excise duty calculation issues, were not considered, noting that these grounds were not raised before the lower authorities. The Court emphasized the importance of raising all relevant grounds at lower levels and established that a notice under Section 148 cannot be sustained if additional reasons for reopening were not previously raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77479</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the reassessment based on a mere change of opinion was not valid under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court rejected the argument that additional grounds for reopening the assessment, including excess gratuity provision and excise duty calculation issues, were not considered, noting that these grounds were not raised before the lower authorities. The Court emphasized the importance of raising all relevant grounds at lower levels and established that a notice under Section 148 cannot be sustained if additional reasons for reopening were not previously raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>