<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 156 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77478</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decisions of the ITAT regarding new vehicle and handling charges, petrol expenses, interest-free advances, and undisclosed receipts. However, the High Court disagreed with the ITAT on discount and commission expenses, upholding the AO&#039;s disallowance due to inconsistencies and lack of evidence. The appeal was partially allowed, favoring the Revenue on the matter of discount and commission expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 156 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77478</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decisions of the ITAT regarding new vehicle and handling charges, petrol expenses, interest-free advances, and undisclosed receipts. However, the High Court disagreed with the ITAT on discount and commission expenses, upholding the AO&#039;s disallowance due to inconsistencies and lack of evidence. The appeal was partially allowed, favoring the Revenue on the matter of discount and commission expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>