<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 350 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77472</link>
    <description>Service tax exemption and valuation issues required fresh examination because the original order did not independently consider the aggregate value of services in the previous year under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. The exemption claim was remanded for reconsideration on that factual and legal condition. The separate plea that material value shown distinctly in invoices could be excluded or abated under Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. was also left open, as the relevant legal position and supporting authorities had not been examined. The disputed order was set aside and the matter sent back for fresh adjudication on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 350 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77472</link>
      <description>Service tax exemption and valuation issues required fresh examination because the original order did not independently consider the aggregate value of services in the previous year under Notification No. 6/2005-S.T. The exemption claim was remanded for reconsideration on that factual and legal condition. The separate plea that material value shown distinctly in invoices could be excluded or abated under Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. was also left open, as the relevant legal position and supporting authorities had not been examined. The disputed order was set aside and the matter sent back for fresh adjudication on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>