https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77464 The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellant, allowing a foreign concern to use a trade mark, did not clearly fall under the category of Management Consultant services as defined by the Finance Act, 1994. As a result, the Tribunal decided not to direct pre-deposit as an interim measure during the appeal process, indicating a preliminary view that the services provided may not fit within the defined scope of Management Consultancy services. This decision led to no recovery of the demand during the appeal's pendency. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77464 The Tribunal found that the services provided by the appellant, allowing a foreign concern to use a trade mark, did not clearly fall under the category of Management Consultant services as defined by the Finance Act, 1994. As a result, the Tribunal decided not to direct pre-deposit as an interim measure during the appeal process, indicating a preliminary view that the services provided may not fit within the defined scope of Management Consultancy services. This decision led to no recovery of the demand during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77464