<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 347 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, providing consequential relief. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to the specifics of show cause notices in tax matters to ensure fair treatment of taxpayers. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable as it did not align with the show cause notice, leading to the appellant&#039;s success in challenging the classification and tax liability issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 347 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, providing consequential relief. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to the specifics of show cause notices in tax matters to ensure fair treatment of taxpayers. The impugned order was deemed unsustainable as it did not align with the show cause notice, leading to the appellant&#039;s success in challenging the classification and tax liability issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>