https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77446 Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 remains sustainable where the show cause notice clearly alleges removal of excisable goods without proper invoice and in contravention of Rule 11, even if Rule 25 is not specifically cited. The omission to mention the penal provision was treated as inadvertent because the noticee was adequately informed of the exact charge and suffered no prejudice in responding to it. A vague-notice objection fails where the factual basis and nature of the alleged violation are sufficiently disclosed. en-us Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77446 Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 remains sustainable where the show cause notice clearly alleges removal of excisable goods without proper invoice and in contravention of Rule 11, even if Rule 25 is not specifically cited. The omission to mention the penal provision was treated as inadvertent because the noticee was adequately informed of the exact charge and suffered no prejudice in responding to it. A vague-notice objection fails where the factual basis and nature of the alleged violation are sufficiently disclosed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77446