<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 247 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77443</link>
    <description>The High Court held that failure to credit Service Tax to the central government within the prescribed period incurs interest under Section 75 of the Act. Emphasizing that payments need not be made to a specific account head, as long as they are credited to the government&#039;s account, liability to pay tax cannot be imposed. The Court stressed timely payments to avoid interest charges and remanded the case for further examination to ascertain the actual payment timeline and compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 247 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77443</link>
      <description>The High Court held that failure to credit Service Tax to the central government within the prescribed period incurs interest under Section 75 of the Act. Emphasizing that payments need not be made to a specific account head, as long as they are credited to the government&#039;s account, liability to pay tax cannot be imposed. The Court stressed timely payments to avoid interest charges and remanded the case for further examination to ascertain the actual payment timeline and compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>