<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77426</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee. It found that the assessee had made full disclosure in the income tax return and provided a bona fide explanation, leading to the deletion of the penalty. The Court emphasized that merely making an unsustainable claim does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77426</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT, ruling in favor of the respondent-assessee. It found that the assessee had made full disclosure in the income tax return and provided a bona fide explanation, leading to the deletion of the penalty. The Court emphasized that merely making an unsustainable claim does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>