<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 123 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77421</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to set aside acquisition proceedings initiated by the Competent Authority under Section 269A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal accepted the property&#039;s value at Rs. 15 lacs, rejecting the Competent Authority&#039;s valuation of Rs. 30 lacs. Factors such as distress sale circumstances and comparison with another property&#039;s value were considered. The Court found no valid reason to support the higher valuation, ultimately dismissing the appeals and emphasizing the lack of justification for the substantial difference between the apparent consideration and fair market value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 123 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77421</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to set aside acquisition proceedings initiated by the Competent Authority under Section 269A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal accepted the property&#039;s value at Rs. 15 lacs, rejecting the Competent Authority&#039;s valuation of Rs. 30 lacs. Factors such as distress sale circumstances and comparison with another property&#039;s value were considered. The Court found no valid reason to support the higher valuation, ultimately dismissing the appeals and emphasizing the lack of justification for the substantial difference between the apparent consideration and fair market value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>