https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77418 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order for non-compliance with the stay order terms. The appellant's deposit of 50% of the demanded service tax exceeded the required pre-deposit amount. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration without further pre-deposit, granting the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Technical Member, Hon'ble Shri M. Veeraiyan, provided detailed reasoning for the decision. en-us Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77418 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order for non-compliance with the stay order terms. The appellant's deposit of 50% of the demanded service tax exceeded the required pre-deposit amount. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration without further pre-deposit, granting the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The Technical Member, Hon'ble Shri M. Veeraiyan, provided detailed reasoning for the decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77418