<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 118 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77416</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the original authority for further verification based on a decision by the Larger Bench. The Tribunal held that no Service Tax was payable for procuring orders as the activity was limited to that. The absence of a written agreement did not impact the decision, emphasizing the focus on the nature of services provided rather than formalities. The ruling clarified the importance of assessing actual services rendered to determine tax liability accurately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 118 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77416</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the original authority for further verification based on a decision by the Larger Bench. The Tribunal held that no Service Tax was payable for procuring orders as the activity was limited to that. The absence of a written agreement did not impact the decision, emphasizing the focus on the nature of services provided rather than formalities. The ruling clarified the importance of assessing actual services rendered to determine tax liability accurately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>