<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 158 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77413</link>
    <description>Excess service tax paid was adjusted against subsequent service tax liability for services rendered to a Special Economic Zone, and Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules was interpreted liberally to permit such adjustment. Earlier decisions had accepted similar offsets, and the Tribunal held that the adjustment could not be denied even on a stricter reading. The Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the adjustment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 158 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77413</link>
      <description>Excess service tax paid was adjusted against subsequent service tax liability for services rendered to a Special Economic Zone, and Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules was interpreted liberally to permit such adjustment. Earlier decisions had accepted similar offsets, and the Tribunal held that the adjustment could not be denied even on a stricter reading. The Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected and the adjustment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>