<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 352 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77404</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that interest rates higher than those specified under Section 11AB cannot be imposed through subordinate rules. The order demanding interest exceeding the prescribed rates was set aside, directing the appellants to pay interest at the specified rates within four weeks. The appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was also granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 352 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77404</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that interest rates higher than those specified under Section 11AB cannot be imposed through subordinate rules. The order demanding interest exceeding the prescribed rates was set aside, directing the appellants to pay interest at the specified rates within four weeks. The appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was also granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>