<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 536 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s order restricting the interest rate to 15% per annum unjustified. Upholding the assessee&#039;s claim for 24% interest, as approved in previous orders and consistent with High Court rulings, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the issue had been settled in prior decisions, rendering the Commissioner&#039;s objection outdated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 536 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s order restricting the interest rate to 15% per annum unjustified. Upholding the assessee&#039;s claim for 24% interest, as approved in previous orders and consistent with High Court rulings, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The Tribunal emphasized the issue had been settled in prior decisions, rendering the Commissioner&#039;s objection outdated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>