<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77392</link>
    <description>Export liability for iron ore fines must be assessed on the goods as actually presented for export. Where the cargo was exported in moist condition, a later moisture-free chemical test showing higher Fe content could not be relied on to sustain confiscation or penalty, especially when earlier certificates and destination-port inspection material indicated a lower Fe content. Applying the principle that the sample must be tested in the same condition as exported, the moisture-free analysis was treated as an unreliable basis for liability. On that reasoning, confiscation and penalty were held not sustainable and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 705 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77392</link>
      <description>Export liability for iron ore fines must be assessed on the goods as actually presented for export. Where the cargo was exported in moist condition, a later moisture-free chemical test showing higher Fe content could not be relied on to sustain confiscation or penalty, especially when earlier certificates and destination-port inspection material indicated a lower Fe content. Applying the principle that the sample must be tested in the same condition as exported, the moisture-free analysis was treated as an unreliable basis for liability. On that reasoning, confiscation and penalty were held not sustainable and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>