<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 335 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77378</link>
    <description>A 100% Export Oriented Unit manufacturing polyester yarn disputed revenue demand that education cess be levied again while computing excise duty. The legal basis was that once the aggregate of customs duties is determined by percentage addition for customs purposes, further addition of education cess to compute excise duty is impermissible; adding another percentage beyond the computed aggregate effectively taxes the same component again. Consequently the additional education cess demand seeking to be levied a further time was held unsustainable and not payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 15:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 335 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77378</link>
      <description>A 100% Export Oriented Unit manufacturing polyester yarn disputed revenue demand that education cess be levied again while computing excise duty. The legal basis was that once the aggregate of customs duties is determined by percentage addition for customs purposes, further addition of education cess to compute excise duty is impermissible; adding another percentage beyond the computed aggregate effectively taxes the same component again. Consequently the additional education cess demand seeking to be levied a further time was held unsustainable and not payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>