<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 380 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77353</link>
    <description>Refund claims under the exemption notifications were treated as sustainable where the substantive conditions were met: full duty payment, timely taxi registration, refund to the customer, and filing of the refund claim within six months. The intimation regarding availment of credit was regarded as a procedural requirement of a technical nature, so non-compliance with that formality did not defeat the exemption. However, the portion of the refund claim filed beyond limitation remained time barred and was not admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 380 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77353</link>
      <description>Refund claims under the exemption notifications were treated as sustainable where the substantive conditions were met: full duty payment, timely taxi registration, refund to the customer, and filing of the refund claim within six months. The intimation regarding availment of credit was regarded as a procedural requirement of a technical nature, so non-compliance with that formality did not defeat the exemption. However, the portion of the refund claim filed beyond limitation remained time barred and was not admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>