<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 352 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77346</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty from Rs. One lakh to Rs. 10,000 based on the interpretation of the Cenvat Credit Rules and the specific circumstances of the case, emphasizing the distinction between contraventions under Rule 15(2) and Rule 15(1.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 352 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77346</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty from Rs. One lakh to Rs. 10,000 based on the interpretation of the Cenvat Credit Rules and the specific circumstances of the case, emphasizing the distinction between contraventions under Rule 15(2) and Rule 15(1.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>