<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 376 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to decide the appeal in accordance with the law, taking into account relevant legal precedents and circulars, with a deadline set for the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 376 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to decide the appeal in accordance with the law, taking into account relevant legal precedents and circulars, with a deadline set for the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>