<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 328 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77338</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit for Service tax paid on GTA services for outward freight in export scenarios. The decision clarified that the port of shipment could be considered the place of removal, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument and relying on previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 328 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77338</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit for Service tax paid on GTA services for outward freight in export scenarios. The decision clarified that the port of shipment could be considered the place of removal, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument and relying on previous Tribunal rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>