<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 342 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77329</link>
    <description>Remission of duty for goods missing from a bonded warehouse is confined to loss caused by natural causes or unavoidable accident; alleged theft or dacoity does not qualify, and where theft is not proved the disappearance may support an inference of clandestine removal, so the duty demand stands. Interest on duty determined under the excise interest framework follows as a statutory consequence after duty is quantified, even if the show-cause notice did not expressly ask for it. A nominal penalty was also sustained, with no sufficient ground shown for interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 342 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77329</link>
      <description>Remission of duty for goods missing from a bonded warehouse is confined to loss caused by natural causes or unavoidable accident; alleged theft or dacoity does not qualify, and where theft is not proved the disappearance may support an inference of clandestine removal, so the duty demand stands. Interest on duty determined under the excise interest framework follows as a statutory consequence after duty is quantified, even if the show-cause notice did not expressly ask for it. A nominal penalty was also sustained, with no sufficient ground shown for interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>