https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77323 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the demand for 10% value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the imposition of penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal considered the interpretation of Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and decided to examine the issue of the invocation of the extended period further during the final hearing. The appellants were directed to make a specified pre-deposit within a timeframe for the grant of stay during the appeal's pendency. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77323 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the demand for 10% value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the imposition of penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal considered the interpretation of Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules and decided to examine the issue of the invocation of the extended period further during the final hearing. The appellants were directed to make a specified pre-deposit within a timeframe for the grant of stay during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77323