https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77319 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments regarding the non-liability of duty for manufacturing air texturised yarn under the Central Excise Act due to lack of substantial evidence. The matter was remanded for further consideration on determining the assessable value at the factory gate and valuation based on the date of sale. The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period for suppression of facts by the appellant, directing a detailed reconsideration by the adjudicating authority in line with its observations and legal precedents. en-us Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77319 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments regarding the non-liability of duty for manufacturing air texturised yarn under the Central Excise Act due to lack of substantial evidence. The matter was remanded for further consideration on determining the assessable value at the factory gate and valuation based on the date of sale. The Tribunal upheld the invocation of the extended period for suppression of facts by the appellant, directing a detailed reconsideration by the adjudicating authority in line with its observations and legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77319