https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77315 The Bombay High Court rejected the respondent's request for postponement and transfer of the Writ Petition to the Supreme Court. It scrutinized the dispute on export modalities, emphasizing the need for legal authority in withholding contracts and taking back rice. The Court highlighted the prohibition of retrospective application of new policies and granted consequential reliefs to the petitioner while directing each party to bear their own costs. The judgment made the Rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, recognizing their success in the case. en-us Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77315 The Bombay High Court rejected the respondent's request for postponement and transfer of the Writ Petition to the Supreme Court. It scrutinized the dispute on export modalities, emphasizing the need for legal authority in withholding contracts and taking back rice. The Court highlighted the prohibition of retrospective application of new policies and granted consequential reliefs to the petitioner while directing each party to bear their own costs. The judgment made the Rule absolute in favor of the petitioner, recognizing their success in the case. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77315