https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77306 The Tribunal upheld the demand against the appellant for the period from 10-9-2004 to 30th September, 2007, emphasizing the need for the appellant to prove the quantum of goods involved in the works executed. The appellant's claim for deduction of material cost in a works contract was not considered, resulting in a pre-deposit requirement of Rs. 20 lakhs. The Tribunal ruled that completion and finishing services are not eligible for abatement in service tax due to the appellant's failure to prove the quantum of materials involved in the works contracts. en-us Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77306 The Tribunal upheld the demand against the appellant for the period from 10-9-2004 to 30th September, 2007, emphasizing the need for the appellant to prove the quantum of goods involved in the works executed. The appellant's claim for deduction of material cost in a works contract was not considered, resulting in a pre-deposit requirement of Rs. 20 lakhs. The Tribunal ruled that completion and finishing services are not eligible for abatement in service tax due to the appellant's failure to prove the quantum of materials involved in the works contracts. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77306