<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 699 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted interim protection to the Appellant by directing no pre-deposit of the substantial service tax amount during the Appeal, citing concerns about potential public harm and violation of natural justice in the impugned order. The Tribunal refrained from expressing a final opinion on the valuation, classification, time-barred demand, and reimbursement issues, awaiting further developments in the appeal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 699 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted interim protection to the Appellant by directing no pre-deposit of the substantial service tax amount during the Appeal, citing concerns about potential public harm and violation of natural justice in the impugned order. The Tribunal refrained from expressing a final opinion on the valuation, classification, time-barred demand, and reimbursement issues, awaiting further developments in the appeal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>