https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77296 Fresh scrutiny was required of the evidence said to show that the service tax element had already been covered, because the appellant claimed the same transaction could not be taxed twice. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for examination of the relevant material and for a reasoned order on whether double taxation had occurred on the transaction in question. en-us Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77296 Fresh scrutiny was required of the evidence said to show that the service tax element had already been covered, because the appellant claimed the same transaction could not be taxed twice. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for examination of the relevant material and for a reasoned order on whether double taxation had occurred on the transaction in question. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77296