<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 341 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that the wrongly availed input duty Cenvat credit during the SSI exemption period was a bona fide mistake and not intentional. The Appellant rectified the error promptly upon switching to a duty-paying status, allowing them the benefit of SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/03-C.E. Penalties imposed were deemed unjustified as the Tribunal found the violations to be unintentional. The procedural compliance was upheld, noting the Appellant&#039;s correct declaration of Cenvat credit and rectification upon becoming liable for duty, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 341 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, finding that the wrongly availed input duty Cenvat credit during the SSI exemption period was a bona fide mistake and not intentional. The Appellant rectified the error promptly upon switching to a duty-paying status, allowing them the benefit of SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/03-C.E. Penalties imposed were deemed unjustified as the Tribunal found the violations to be unintentional. The procedural compliance was upheld, noting the Appellant&#039;s correct declaration of Cenvat credit and rectification upon becoming liable for duty, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>