<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 317 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77283</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed by remand for further verification and a fresh decision by the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the need to establish the ownership status of the vehicles involved in the transportation services received by the appellants. The Tribunal directed expedited fresh decision after setting aside the impugned orders and granting waiver of predeposit, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 317 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77283</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed by remand for further verification and a fresh decision by the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the need to establish the ownership status of the vehicles involved in the transportation services received by the appellants. The Tribunal directed expedited fresh decision after setting aside the impugned orders and granting waiver of predeposit, ensuring a fair hearing for the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>