<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 96 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellants. While the appellants were held liable for the Service Tax demand, the penalties were deemed unjustified due to the lack of evidence establishing suppression or intent to evade tax. The Tribunal found no coercive findings against the appellants and concluded that the Revenue failed to prove suppression, leading to the penalties being set aside. The appeal was resolved in favor of the appellants, providing them with relief from the imposed penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 96 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 on the appellants. While the appellants were held liable for the Service Tax demand, the penalties were deemed unjustified due to the lack of evidence establishing suppression or intent to evade tax. The Tribunal found no coercive findings against the appellants and concluded that the Revenue failed to prove suppression, leading to the penalties being set aside. The appeal was resolved in favor of the appellants, providing them with relief from the imposed penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>