<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77242</link>
    <description>Service tax liability depends on the taxable event, namely the provision of consulting engineering service, not on later receipt of consideration. Where the service was completed before the levy became effective and there was no evidence of service rendered during the taxable period, payment received after the effective date did not make the transaction taxable. On that reasoning, the demand was treated as unsustainable and relief followed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77242</link>
      <description>Service tax liability depends on the taxable event, namely the provision of consulting engineering service, not on later receipt of consideration. Where the service was completed before the levy became effective and there was no evidence of service rendered during the taxable period, payment received after the effective date did not make the transaction taxable. On that reasoning, the demand was treated as unsustainable and relief followed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>