<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 307 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77200</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order allowing Cenvat credit based on an attested xerox (triplicate) invoice where the assessee demonstrated efforts to obtain attestation, showed duty was paid and goods received. The court held that mere xerox alone is insufficient to grant credit, but once payment and receipt are established, denying credit solely for this procedural irregularity is unjustified. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 307 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77200</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order allowing Cenvat credit based on an attested xerox (triplicate) invoice where the assessee demonstrated efforts to obtain attestation, showed duty was paid and goods received. The court held that mere xerox alone is insufficient to grant credit, but once payment and receipt are established, denying credit solely for this procedural irregularity is unjustified. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>