<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 351 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided did not fall under the taxable category. It was held that the interest earned was not subject to Service tax. The penalty under section 78 was also deemed unjustified in this case. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, including the cancellation of demands, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 351 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the services provided did not fall under the taxable category. It was held that the interest earned was not subject to Service tax. The penalty under section 78 was also deemed unjustified in this case. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, including the cancellation of demands, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>