<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 347 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77190</link>
    <description>Further interest was held unsustainable where service tax had been paid on the full transport charges despite an exemption limiting taxability to 25% of such charges, and the tax and interest legally due were already far below the amount remitted. The authorities also treated the matter as not fit for penalty, reinforcing that no additional monetary burden was warranted on the facts. The demand for further interest was therefore set aside in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 347 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77190</link>
      <description>Further interest was held unsustainable where service tax had been paid on the full transport charges despite an exemption limiting taxability to 25% of such charges, and the tax and interest legally due were already far below the amount remitted. The authorities also treated the matter as not fit for penalty, reinforcing that no additional monetary burden was warranted on the facts. The demand for further interest was therefore set aside in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>