<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 297 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77182</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 78 was treated as sufficient to address the service tax default, and the imposition of two penalties for the same default was held impermissible. The Court also noted that the comparatively small amount involved supported non-interference. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed and the penalty order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 297 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77182</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 78 was treated as sufficient to address the service tax default, and the imposition of two penalties for the same default was held impermissible. The Court also noted that the comparatively small amount involved supported non-interference. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed and the penalty order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>