<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 420 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77169</link>
    <description>The court held that the reimbursement made to the regiment/unit for liquor consumed was not against public policy, and the expenditure incurred for sales promotion was allowable under section 37. Consequently, both issues were decided in favor of the assessee, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 420 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77169</link>
      <description>The court held that the reimbursement made to the regiment/unit for liquor consumed was not against public policy, and the expenditure incurred for sales promotion was allowable under section 37. Consequently, both issues were decided in favor of the assessee, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>