https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77168 The court upheld the Tax Recovery Officer's order dated August 6, 2007, confirming the auction sale of the property for tax recovery. It found the property to be benami and owned by the debtor, rejecting the petitioner's claims of ownership by his mother. The court affirmed the TRO's jurisdiction under Rule 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and concluded that the TRO followed principles of natural justice. The petitioner was advised to pursue remedy through a civil suit within 45 days, and the writ petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77168 The court upheld the Tax Recovery Officer's order dated August 6, 2007, confirming the auction sale of the property for tax recovery. It found the property to be benami and owned by the debtor, rejecting the petitioner's claims of ownership by his mother. The court affirmed the TRO's jurisdiction under Rule 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and concluded that the TRO followed principles of natural justice. The petitioner was advised to pursue remedy through a civil suit within 45 days, and the writ petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77168