<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 579 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77153</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the profit/loss from the sale of equity shares should be treated as a business loss rather than a capital loss. The court emphasized that the shares were purchased with the intention of promoting the company, aligning with the assessee&#039;s business activities of investment and finance. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the court concluded that the loss incurred on the sale of shares qualified as a business loss. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and judgment was in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 579 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77153</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the profit/loss from the sale of equity shares should be treated as a business loss rather than a capital loss. The court emphasized that the shares were purchased with the intention of promoting the company, aligning with the assessee&#039;s business activities of investment and finance. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the court concluded that the loss incurred on the sale of shares qualified as a business loss. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and judgment was in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>