<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 641 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77147</link>
    <description>Block assessments were valid where the Assessing Officer had been placed in additional charge of the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s office and exercised its powers. The de facto doctrine applied because the officer was clothed with the office&#039;s authority and functioned in that capacity; a later challenge to the appointment arrangement did not invalidate official acts. The Commissioner of Income-tax was competent to make the officiating arrangement, and no material displaced that authority. Accordingly, the officer was competent to complete block assessments, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 641 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77147</link>
      <description>Block assessments were valid where the Assessing Officer had been placed in additional charge of the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s office and exercised its powers. The de facto doctrine applied because the officer was clothed with the office&#039;s authority and functioned in that capacity; a later challenge to the appointment arrangement did not invalidate official acts. The Commissioner of Income-tax was competent to make the officiating arrangement, and no material displaced that authority. Accordingly, the officer was competent to complete block assessments, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>