<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 88 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77144</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the assessing authority&#039;s order on merits with reference to each item of &#039;undisclosed income&#039; based on the materials seized during the search. The question of law was answered in favor of the appellant, and all miscellaneous petitions were closed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 88 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77144</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the assessing authority&#039;s order on merits with reference to each item of &#039;undisclosed income&#039; based on the materials seized during the search. The question of law was answered in favor of the appellant, and all miscellaneous petitions were closed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>