<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 339 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellants liable for not fully paying Service Tax on security charges collected, resulting in a demand of Rs. 6,31,60,945/- with interest and penalties. Despite claiming inability to produce detailed records due to a flood, the appellants&#039; arguments lacked sufficient evidence. The Tribunal accepted cash basis accounting but raised concerns about the lack of specific records linking payments to services rendered. Due to inadequate deposit offer, the Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 3 crores within 12 weeks, emphasizing the importance of proper accounts for Service Tax compliance and imposing penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 339 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellants liable for not fully paying Service Tax on security charges collected, resulting in a demand of Rs. 6,31,60,945/- with interest and penalties. Despite claiming inability to produce detailed records due to a flood, the appellants&#039; arguments lacked sufficient evidence. The Tribunal accepted cash basis accounting but raised concerns about the lack of specific records linking payments to services rendered. Due to inadequate deposit offer, the Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 3 crores within 12 weeks, emphasizing the importance of proper accounts for Service Tax compliance and imposing penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>