<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 338 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77130</link>
    <description>The Respondents, manufacturers of MS Ingots, were granted eligibility for Cenvat credit on service tax paid despite paying tax without abatement. The Asstt. Commissioner&#039;s initial refund denial was overturned by the Commissioner (Appeals) based on evidence showing the tax burden was not passed on to customers. The claim for refund of excess service tax was allowed as the Respondent proved no unjust enrichment occurred, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and book of accounts. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering evidence in unjust enrichment cases and not dismissing certificates without contrary proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 338 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77130</link>
      <description>The Respondents, manufacturers of MS Ingots, were granted eligibility for Cenvat credit on service tax paid despite paying tax without abatement. The Asstt. Commissioner&#039;s initial refund denial was overturned by the Commissioner (Appeals) based on evidence showing the tax burden was not passed on to customers. The claim for refund of excess service tax was allowed as the Respondent proved no unjust enrichment occurred, supported by a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate and book of accounts. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering evidence in unjust enrichment cases and not dismissing certificates without contrary proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>