<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 507 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77126</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Authority&#039;s orders under sections 269UD(1) and 269UE(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court found the orders illegal and invalid due to incorrect rate determination and lack of proper valuation assessment. Emphasizing the importance of considering all terms and conditions in property agreements, the judgment ruled in favor of the petitioner, highlighting the necessity of thorough valuation assessments to prevent unjust outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 507 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77126</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Authority&#039;s orders under sections 269UD(1) and 269UE(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court found the orders illegal and invalid due to incorrect rate determination and lack of proper valuation assessment. Emphasizing the importance of considering all terms and conditions in property agreements, the judgment ruled in favor of the petitioner, highlighting the necessity of thorough valuation assessments to prevent unjust outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>